Legal Opinion
In Re Healy
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho
Decided September 16, 2010No. 18-41199PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JIM D. PAPPAS, Bankruptcy Judge.
In each of these three chapter 7 cases, 1 in connection with his final accountings, trustee Jeremy Gugino (“Trustee”) has applied for approval of his compensation seeking the maximum amount allowed under § 326(a) based upon the respective amounts to be distributed to creditors. 2 When Trustee’s fee application was submitted to the Court for its review, the Court could not discern, based solely upon the docket and record in each case, that Trustee’s requests for compensation were “reasonable” in light of the services he performed, as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roderick v. Levy (In Re Roderick Timber Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re WardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hopkins v. Asset Acceptance LLC (In Re Salgado-Nava)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re B & B Autotransfusion Services, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2011
- In re GaldabiniUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2012
- In re Robert Plan Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2012