Bowman v. Knorr
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 342, Jan. T., 1903, by Mary A. Knorr and Mildred Knorr Smith from order of O. P. Columbia Co., dismissing 'exceptions to auditor’s report in case of Bowman et al. to use of George W. Vansiclen v. Samuel Knorr. Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Little, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Fell,
An antenuptial agreement between the testator and the appellant, who became his second wife, provided that if she survived him she should receive in lieu of dower and all claims under the intestate laws one third of the income of his real and personal estate for life, “ and in addition thereto so much of the principal as in her judgment shall be necessary for her comfortable maintenance, but that at her death all property not consumed by her which she shall receive through this marriage shall go to his children and not to hers, others than such as may be the issue…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Coane's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Pratt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Brown's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Goeckel's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Zeitchick EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.