Legal Opinion
Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 14, 2021No. 3:20-cv-03343Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FORTINET, INC., Case No. 20-cv-03343-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 10 FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Docket No. 71 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 In this case, Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc. (“Fortinet”) alleges that Defendant Forescout 16 Technologies, Inc. (“Forescout”) has committed numerous acts of patent infringement. Fortinet 17 brings claims for contributory, induced, and willful infringement against Forescout based on five 18 patents relating…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.