Gallick v. United States
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CON ABO Y, District Judge.
This is an action for damages brought under the Swine Flu Act, formerly codified at 42 U.S.C. § 247b(jM1) (1976), 1 and the Federal Tort Claims Act (hereinafter FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. Presently before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by the Defendant. 2 The basis of this motion is that Plaintiff’s claim for relief is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
Our review of the materials submitted herein…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Kuchinic v. McCrorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation. Gerald Hogan, M.D. v. The Dow Chemical Company Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company Hercules Incorporated Monsanto Company T H Agriculture & Nutrition Company, Inc. And Uniroyal, Inc., Clara Fraticelli v. The Dow Chemical Company Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Company Hercules Incorporated Monsanto Company T H Agriculture & Nutrition Company, Inc. Uniroyal, Inc. The United States of America and Ten Former Regents of the University of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- In Re Swine Flu Products Liability Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Rowe v. MarderDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Shelly v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- McDonald v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.