Legal Opinion

Hansford v. Van Auken

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8329PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

— Appellee, as administrator of the estate of Mary A. Hansford, sued appellant on a judgment for alimony in a divorce case theretofore rendered in the same court.

Appellant demurred to the complaint, which demurrer was overruled. He then filed an answer in denial and a special paragraph. Appellee demurred to the special paragraph, which demurrer was sustained, and appellant reserved exceptions to the foregoing rulings. Trial by court, finding for appellee, motion for a new trial Overruled, exceptions reserved, and judgment on the finding.

Errors have been assigned in this court upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gould v. HaydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Kelley v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Palmer v. GloverIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Waltz v. BorrowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Davidson v. NebakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Simonton v. SimontonIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Marsh v. MarshIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Rutenic v. HamakarOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Toner v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Brisbane v. DobsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API