Legal Opinion

Piecknick v. Comwlth. of PA

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 30, 1994No. 93-3002UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, Fred, Dorothy and Dan Pieck-nick, operators of Piecknick Towing (collectively “Piecknick”), appeal an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania dismissing their complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In their complaint, Piecknick alleged that appel-lees, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania State Police, and several officials of the State Police 1 (collectively the “State Police”), deprived…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fred Piecknick v. Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API