Legal Opinion

United States v. William Boyd

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 17, 2017No. 15-10866 Cons w/15-10947PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a consolidated criminal appeal in which David Lee Brewer and William Eugene Boyd (collectively, “the Appellants”) each pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to one count of bank robbery. The Appellants were sentenced as career offenders in separate proceedings. The Appellants both objected to application of the career-offender enhancement during sentencing. The district court in both cases overruled this objection, and Brewer and Boyd now appeal. Because federal bank robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under § 4B1.2(a)(l), we AFFIRM.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Tommy Ray HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Jorge RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Pedro Calderon-PenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. Marcus WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Jerome WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Samuel GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API