Legal Opinion

Rush v. Kirk

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1942No. 2367PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Lewis C. Rush, assigned an oil and gas prospecting permit, issued to him by the government, to appellee, Valentine M. Kirk, under a contract which provided that Kirk would attempt to secure an enlarged permit consolidating appellant’s permit therewith; that if consolidation were effected, Kirk should commence a test well on some part of the land covered by appellant’s permit by June 1, 1934; that appellant should have eight per cent of all oil and gas produced from any 160 acres of land covered by his permit which he might select, and an additional two per…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Younglove v. Graham & HillWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  2. King v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. United States v. Southwest Potash Corporation and American Surety Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. Strang Telecasting, Inc. v. ErnstWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Strang Telecasting, Inc. v. ErnstWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API