Legal Opinion
Tegnazian v. Consolidated Edison, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Barry A. Cozier, J.
Plaintiffs move, pursuant to CPLR 901, for class certification *153in this action for damages arising out of the blackout which occurred in July 1999, in the area of Manhattan north of 155th Street.
Factual Allegations
Plaintiffs and all putative class members are located in Manhattan north of 155th Street, and receive their electric power from defendants Consolidated Edison, Inc., and Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc. (collectively Con Ed). On July 6, 1999, at approximately 10:30 a.m., Con Ed cut off power to this neighborhood, during a time when the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Pruitt v. Rockefeller Center Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Woodrow v. Colt Industries Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Mitchell v. Barrios-PaoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Solomon v. Bell Atlantic Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Muise v. GPU, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc. v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of New Jersey, Inc. v. Philip Morris Usa Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Shelton v. Elite Model Management, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.