Cavadini v. Larson

The appellant makes three contentions: (1) that the plaintiff could not join two causes of action, *202but was limited to suit on the note or to foreclose the mortgage; (2) that the plaintiff could not garnish the insurance money until after procuring a judgment for deficiency in the foreclosure action; (3) that the insurance money was exempt because the property burned was the defendant’s homestead.(1) The appellant contends that the plaintiff cannot join in one complaint an action on the note and an action to foreclose the mortgage; that the plaintiff in fact has but one cause of action, which…