Legal Opinion

State v. Fancy

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 20, 1983No. 1 CA-CR 6051PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREER, Judge.

The determinative issue in this case is whether the defendant is entitled to a new trial because he was convicted by an eight person jury when the Arizona Constitution and state statute required a twelve person jury. The facts necessary to a resolution of this matter are as follows.

The defendant was charged by indictment with count one, trafficking in stolen property, second degree, a class three felony; count two, second degree burglary, a class three felony; and, count three, theft, a class four felony. The state alleged two prior convictions. After the evidence had been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ballew v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. CookArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. MadisonArizona Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FancyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API