State v. Fancy
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREER, Judge.
The determinative issue in this case is whether the defendant is entitled to a new trial because he was convicted by an eight person jury when the Arizona Constitution and state statute required a twelve person jury. The facts necessary to a resolution of this matter are as follows.
The defendant was charged by indictment with count one, trafficking in stolen property, second degree, a class three felony; count two, second degree burglary, a class three felony; and, count three, theft, a class four felony. The state alleged two prior convictions. After the evidence had been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ballew v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. CookArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. MadisonArizona Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. FancyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983