Herbert H. Pape, Inc. v. Finch
Supreme Court of Florida
1Dissent
Ellis, J.,
(Dissenting) : The petition for rehearing in this case should be denied not only because the petition violates the rule obtaining in this State controlling such petitions but the views of law expressed and argued in the petition as they apply to the case at bar are not sound. See Jones v. Fox, 23 Fla. 462, 2 South. Rep. 853; Hull v. Burr, 58 Fla. 475, 50 South. Rep. 768; Malsby v. Gamble, 61 Fla. 327, 54 South. Rep. 766; Stewart v. Preston, 80 Fla. 479, 86 South. Rep. 348; Payne v. Ivey, 83 Fla. 436, 93 South. Rep. 143; A. C. L. R. Co. v. Lakeland, 94 Fla. 347, 115 South. Rep. 669.
Th…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Wiltcher v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
- Taylor v. A. G. Branham & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Payne v. IveySupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Finlayson v. LipscombSupreme Court of Florida · 1876
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.