Legal Opinion

State v. Vanderburg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 13, 1989No. M-87-021; CA A47322PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*430ROSSMAN, J.

The issue in this case is whether the court should consider a petition for court-appointed attorney fees, notwithstanding that the petition was filed untimely.

This is a mental commitment case involving an indigent defendant. Counsel was appointed to represent him on appeal. On September 14,1988, we issued our decision affirming the trial court’s decision. 93 Or App 202, 761 P2d 555 (1988). On October 7,1988, 22 days after the decision, counsel filed her petition for court-appointed attorney fees. Her petition was accompanied by a motion for waiver of ORAP 11.11(1). The rule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rodda v. RoddaOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Town Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. AndersenOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. VanderburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API