Legal Opinion
Coburn Corp. of America v. Orr
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided September 8, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLester Sacks, J.
On July 13, 1966, defendants Nathan Orr, Jr., and Kathryn Orr purchased a color television console set from Maurice Stewart & Co., Ltd., under a retail installment contract that was subsequently assigned to the plaintiff. Contained *913in the contract is a section entitled ‘ ‘ Guaranty ’ ’ that was executed by the defendant Nathan Orr, at the time of the purchase, guaranteeing the payment of the unpaid balance of $740. The action against the buyers, Nathan Orr, Jr., and Kathryn Orr has been settled, while the action against the guarantor, Nathan Orr, has been submitted to the court, for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Becker v. FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Pink v. Investors Syndicate Title & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Pink v. Investors Syndicate Title & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. Brooklyn Properties Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- 100 Parkway Road, Inc. v. Johns-Manville, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Leasing Corp. v. Franklin Plaza Apartments, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1971
- FinanceAmerica Private Brands, Inc. v. Harvey E. Hall, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1977
- Liberty National Bank and Trust Co. v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972