Cave v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
613 So.2d 454 (1993)
Frederick CAVE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 77937.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 4, 1993.
George F. Schaefer, Gainesville, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Charlie McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review Cave v. State, 578 So.2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), which certified the following question of great public importance:
DOES THE TEMPORAL PROXIMITY OF CRIMES ALONE PROVIDE A VALID REASON FOR DEPARTURE FROM THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES WITHOUT A FINDING OF A PERSISTENT PATTERN OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT?
Cave, 578…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Barkett; Concurrence · Kogan.
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- State v. McCloudSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- State v. WellerSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- Sirmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Gainer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.