Legal Opinion

Yonter v. Aetna Finance Co.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided October 18, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-0973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

LIVAUDAIS, District Judge.

The Court was presented with dual motions for summary judgment, in the above captioned case, by both defendants, Aetna Finance Company (“Aetna”) and Credit Bureau, Inc. of Georgia (“CBI”). For the reasons stated below, this court grants summary judgment in favor of both defendants.

FACTS

ITT Consumer Finance Corporation (“ITT”) was listed on plaintiff Samuel M. Yonter’s credit report as being a party that requested credit information on him. Aet-na is a subsidiary of ITT. It was Aetna who used this information to send pre-ap-proved guaranteed loan…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Boothe v. TRW Credit DataDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Polzer v. TRW, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
Gottsegen v. National Information Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997