Legal Opinion
Krl v. Aquaro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 2008No. 06-16282Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRL; ROLAND WOMACK; NADINE WOMACK; LARRY DWIGHT WOMACK; LUKE WOMACK; RENEE WOMACK, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ESTATE OF RUSSELL MOORE; DAVID J. IREY; TODD D. RIEBE; RON HALL; No. 06-16282 AMADOR COUNTY; CALIFORNIA D.C. No. STATE OF, CV-99-02437-DFL Defendants, and ELLEN M. AQUARO, Successor in Interest and Representative of the Estate of Russell Moore, Defendant-Appellant. 569 570 KRL v. AQUARO KRL; ROLAND WOMACK; NADINE WOMACK; LARRY DWIGHT WOMACK; LUKE WOMACK; RENEE WOMACK, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ESTATE OF RUSSELL…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jeffers v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.