Legal Opinion

Horner v. Ponderosa Pine Logging

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1985No. 15200Published

1Opinion of the Court

695 P.2d 1250 (1985)

107 Idaho 1111

Harry Ray HORNER, Claimant-Appellant,

v.

PONDEROSA PINE LOGGING, Employer, and Insurance Company of North America, Surety, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 15200.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

February 12, 1985.

John B. Ingelstrom, and Gary L. Cooper, Pocatello, for claimant-appellant.

Alan R. Gardner, Boise, for defendants-respondents.

McFADDEN, Justice Pro Tem.

Claimant Harry Horner seeks worker's compensation benefits for a heart attack he claims occurred on or about July 23, 1981, while he was working as a logger. Claimant's case was assigned by the Industrial Commission…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Booth v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Paulson v. Idaho Forest Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Farm Bureau Fin. Co., Inc. v. CarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Horner v. Ponderosa Pine LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Mager v. Garrett Freightlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API