Legal Opinion

Berlein v. Eddy

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 5, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

In January, 1922, A. G. Cason was indebted to Berlein, the plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff in the action below, in the sum of $230.00 and gave to Berlein a chattel mortgage upon the former’s “entire crops of every kind and description,” to secure the payment of the debt. The debt was incurred for the purchase price of a mule, the title to which remained in the plaintiff, according to the mortgage, until the latter was paid. The mortgage also covered all “live stock and * * other personal property, including all round or square timber, * * including turpentine raised in the years…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurst v. Bell & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Ehrman v. OatsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Randall v. HigbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Googins v. GilmoreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1859
  5. Welch v. WhittemoreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1845

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cresbard Grain Co. v. FarnhamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. Standard Baking Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Merit Clothing Co. v. LeesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. First Nat'l. Bank of Brooksville v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Weber v. Belle Mead Dev. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API