Legal Opinion

Evenson v. Hlebechuk

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1981No. Civ 9899PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

The defendants, David and Janice Hlebe-chuk, appeal from a summary judgment entered against them by the District Court of Cass County contending that they should have been allowed to present parol evidence concerning a promissory note issued by them to plaintiff, William Evenson. We affirm the summary judgment entered by the district court.

It is undisputed that Evenson was employed by the Hlebechuks to sell a twelve-plex apartment building in Casselton, North Dakota. A purchaser, Darwin Jacobson, was procured by Evenson. An earnest money receipt and agreement was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. First State Bank v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Winkjer v. HerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Johnson v. AuranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Smith v. Michael Kurtz Construction CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. E. E. E., Inc. v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Production Credit Ass'n of Fargo v. FossNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bishop Ryan High School v. LindbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Midwest Processing Co. v. McHenry County Ex Rel. McHenry County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. OstlieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API