Kanofsky v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Dr. Alvin S. Kanofsky appeals, pro se, the decision of the United States Tax Court sustaining the determination by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) of deficiencies related to his federal tax returns for the years 1996 through 1998. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the judgment of the Tax Court.
I
The parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history is assumed. To summarize, Kanofsky, a full-time professor of physics at Lehigh University filed individual tax returns in 1996 through 2000 where he reported, on Schedule C, Profit or Loss…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Interstate Transit Lines v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Thompson v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011
- Kanofsky v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
- Damon R. Becnel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
- Griffin v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
- Kornhauser v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013