Haney v. Neace-Stark Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion
Rehearing denied October 23, 1923.
On Petition for Rehearing.
(219 Pac. 190.)
Mr. J. J. Heilner and Messrs. Clifford & Correll, for the petition.
Messrs. McColloch & McCollooh, contra.
BROWN, J.
The Neace-Stark Company, through its attorneys, has filed a petition for a rehearing. *120For a full statement of the facts and issues involved herein, see Haney v. Neace-Stark Co., supra, 94 (216 Pac. 757).
The court expressly set forth in finding of fact No. 18—
“That the extent of appropriations and application and use of water * * cannot be determined in this proceeding from the pleadings and evidence…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Mayor of Vicksburg v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- O'Hara v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Astoria v. Astoria & Columbia River R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.