Howard v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J. :
Joseph S. Howard sued William Schmidt for the recovery of the possession of a tract of land described by metes and bounds, being in fact the west twenty-five feet of a quarter-section. The petition was- drawn in general terms under the statute, and the answer was a general denial. At the trial plaintiff introduced a series of conveyances covering the entire quarter-section, beginning with a patent from the United States and ending with a deed to himself. The defendant’s testimony disclosed that the real controversy was whether the strip of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. FarrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Clark v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Board of Commissioners of Woodson County v. HeedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Illinois Central Railroad v. SwalmMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
- Butts v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Board of County Commissioners v. MinnearSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905