Legal Opinion

Howard v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1905No. 13,893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J. :

Joseph S. Howard sued William Schmidt for the recovery of the possession of a tract of land described by metes and bounds, being in fact the west twenty-five feet of a quarter-section. The petition was- drawn in general terms under the statute, and the answer was a general denial. At the trial plaintiff introduced a series of conveyances covering the entire quarter-section, beginning with a patent from the United States and ending with a deed to himself. The defendant’s testimony disclosed that the real controversy was whether the strip of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FarrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. Clark v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Board of Commissioners of Woodson County v. HeedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. SwalmMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Butts v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. MinnearSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API