Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Marshall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1931No. Civil No. 3116Published

1Concurrence

McALISTER, C. J.,

Specially Concurring. — -I con-' cur in the opinion of Mr. Justice ROSS. It leaves-no doubt in my mind as to the correctness of the conclusion reached therein that under the statutes of this state an order of a committing magistrate admitting to bail a person accused of a capital offense is an adjudicated matter and, hence, beyond the power of the court to which he is held to answer or any other court to change. The proposition was so novel and out of harmony with the view generally accepted as true in this jurisdiction that it did not impress me as meriting serious…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API