Diacon v. Bank of Commerce of Coweta
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Wagoner County Court; W. T. Drake, Judge. Action by E. C. Diacon against the Bank of Commerce of Coweta. From the judgment, Diacon brings 'error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
Counsel for plaintiff in error says in bis brief (there is no brief for defendant in error) that “the law governing all questions has long been recognized as fundamental principles so well settled and adjudicated” that he deems it useless to give authorities; “that each and every exception and objection to the ruling of the court is well taken, and that this court from a perusal of the transcript will sustain plaintiff in error in his contention, and reverse and remand this action as prayed for by plaintiff in error.”
Rule 25 of the Supreme Court (20 Okla. xii, 95 Pac. viii) provides:
“The…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Tefft v. TefftMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Renfrow v. IttlesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Carter v. NyeMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Utah Ass'n of Credit Men v. BowmanUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Rosenstein v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.