Legal Opinion

Udall v. Trustees

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1821PublishedCited by 6 opinions

IN ERROR, on certiorari, to a Justice’s Court. The trustees of the village of Brooklyn, in the county of Kings, brought an action of debt against Udall, the plaintiff in error, to recover the penalty of twenty-five dollars, for the breach of an ordinance of the village of B. in exercising the office of a measurer of grain, for hire, &c. without being licensed by the trustees of the village.

Read the full summary

IN ERROR, on certiorari, to a Justice’s Court. The trustees of the village of Brooklyn, in the county of Kings, brought an action of debt against Udall, the plaintiff in error, to recover the penalty of twenty-five dollars, for the breach of an ordinance of the village of B. in exercising the office of a measurer of grain, for hire, &c. without being licensed by the trustees of the village. By the act of J ° J April 12, 1816, (sess. 39. ch. 95.) the freeholders and _ ' . , n .... 1 . , _ habitants or />. within certain limits, were declared to be a corporation, by the name of the trustees of…

1Per curiam

This was an action for a penalty, for violating the by-law of the village of Brooklyn, in assuming to exercise the office of measurer of grain, without a license from the trustees. The defence was, that the act complained of was done in a store, on a wharf or dock,' west of the natural low-water mark of the East River, on the Nassau, or Long-Island shore, and not within the limits of Brooklyn. We are of opinion that Kings County includes all - the wharves and made land on the Long Island shore of the East River, as well as natural alluvion, to the actual line of low water. The judgment of the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. in Re Occidental Chemical Corporation, Oxy Ingleside Energy Center, LLC, Oxy Ingleside Lpg Terminal LLC, and Oxy Ingleside Oil Terminal LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Luke v. City of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Tebo v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. New York Dock Co. v. Flinn-O'Rourke Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Clement v. BurnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API