Legal Opinion
Simons v. Detroit Twist Drill Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1904No. Docket No. 73Published
Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Summary proceedings by- David W. Simons against the Detroit Twist Drill Company to recover the possession of certain premises. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, complainant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
The following statement of facts is taken from the brief of appellant’s counsel:
“By a warranty deed dated February 8, 1896, the Diamond Match Company, conveyed to Burroughs H. Roth-well the property known as the ‘ Old Diamond Match Plant.’ Roth well gave back to the Diamond Match Company a mortgage on the property, which bore date March 25, 1896, and, by a warranty deed bearing the same date, conveyed the property to E. W. Scane. By warranty deed bearing date November 12, 1897, Scane conveyed the property to A. C. Peoples, who gave back to Scane a mortgage on the property, which bore date…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wolf v. HoltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Kunzie v. WixomMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Pattison v. DryerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Trumpower v. MarceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892