Middleton v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentFboessel, J.
A majority of the court hold the view that, under the pleadings in this case, the appellant, City of New York, and the ■ third-party defendant-respondent railroad which it has impleaded, are joint tort-feasors in pari delicto, and that impleader under section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act should not be allowed. I am unable to concur in this conclusion; ■
I agree, of course, that a third-party complaint which shows on its face that the defendant and the third-party are joint tortfeasors in pari delicto mush be dismissed, in the absence of a relation between the parties to the third-party…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Village of Port Jervis v. . First National B'k.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Tremblay v. . Harmony MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- City of Rochester v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Kromback v. KillianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.