Legal Opinion · Dissent

Middleton v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1950Published

1DissentFboessel, J.

A majority of the court hold the view that, under the pleadings in this case, the appellant, City of New York, and the ■ third-party defendant-respondent railroad which it has impleaded, are joint tort-feasors in pari delicto, and that impleader under section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act should not be allowed. I am unable to concur in this conclusion; ■

I agree, of course, that a third-party complaint which shows on its face that the defendant and the third-party are joint tortfeasors in pari delicto mush be dismissed, in the absence of a relation between the parties to the third-party…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Village of Port Jervis v. . First National B'k.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Tremblay v. . Harmony MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. City of Rochester v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Kromback v. KillianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API