Legal Opinion

Deutsch v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Whether or not the action of the police commissioner in refusing a license was arbitrary or capricious cannot be determined upon the present *998state of the record. While the commissioner may refuse to grant a license on the basis of relevant information derived from different sources (Matter of Barresi v. Biggs, 203 App. Div. 2, 6; Matter of Agoglia v. Mulrooney, 259 N. Y. 462, 465; People ex rel. Lodes v. Department of Health, 189 N. Y. 187, 194; Matter of Fink v. Cole, 286 App. Div. 73, dissenting opn. by Botein, J., p. 85, revd. 1 N Y 2d 48), he must disclose the circumstances forming the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lodes v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Matter of Agoglia v. MulrooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. In re BarresiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Fink v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Penedo Cia Naviera S.A. v. Nicholas Maniatis, LibellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API