Legal Opinion

Prendergast v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1916Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with costs, motion for new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the court erred in its charge upon the subject of adverse inference permissible to be drawn from the unexplained absence of a witness to a material fact. (Wade v. City of Mount Vernon, 133 App. Div. 389, 390; Reehil v. Fraas, 129 id. 563, 566.) Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented upon the ground that the instructions in question as made at folios 652, 653 a.nd 672 did not constitute capital error.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wade v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909