Legal Opinion

State of Wisconsin v. 3M Company

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 3, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00028Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873 TRANSFER ORDER Before the Panel:* We are presented with motions in three actions. First, defendant 3M Company moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(c) to transfer the Fleming action listed on Schedule A to the District of South Carolina for inclusion in MDL No. 2873. No party responded to this motion. Second, plaintiffs and defendant Kester, LLC, each move under Panel Rule 7.1 to vacate our order that conditionally transferred the McKinnon action listed on Schedule A to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Ins. Co. of America Sales Pract.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2001
  2. In re Ford Motor Co. DPS6 Powershift Transmission Prods. Liab. Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
  3. In re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Prods. Liab. Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
  4. In re Watson Fentanyl Patch Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  5. In Re MLR, LLC, Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API