Legal Opinion

Agnew v. Gibson

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 6, 1947No. File No. 11876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

When one makes a motion to amend it is not filed until the amendment itself is filed separately. When a motion for more specific statement is ordered, such a statement must be filed. However, allegations expunged are out of the case for all purposes. Colvin v. Peck, 62 Conn. 155, 158. Granting that it is easier for pleader and the trier to have the allegations left in one pleading, it is nevertheless so that an amendment waives right to review of action on original pleading.Antman v. Connecticut Light Power Co., 117 Conn. 230, and see Pettus v. Gault, 81 Conn. 415.

Notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Pettus v. GaultSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Colvin v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. Bridgeport Radiology Associates, No. 259604 (Dec. 23, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API