Legal Opinion
United States v. Patras
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 20, 2012No. Civil Action No. 08-2079 (JEI/KMW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge.
This is a civil federal tax liability suit brought by the United States against Defendant Ruth Patras pursuant to the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“UFTA”), N.J.S.A. §§ 25:2-20 to -34. The United States argues that Defendant Patras’s husband, Dr. Anthony Patras, sought to evade his federal income tax liabilities by fraudu*403lently transferring 6 Princess Court, Holmdel, NJ (“the Property”) to Defendant Patras.
This Court held a bench trial on September 4-6 and September 21, 2012. The Court now issues this Opinion in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- 24 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1414, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,841 Max Sugarman Funeral Home, Inc. v. A.D.B. InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Valley Finance, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Shades Ridge Holding Company, Inc. v. United States of America, United States of America v. Sam A. Fiorella and Shades Ridge Holding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Gilchinsky v. NATIONAL WESTMINISTER BANKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. HOVNANIANDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- United States v. THE ESTATE OF LORRAINE M. KELLEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- United States v. WUNDERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019