Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Metro. Prop. and Cas. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 2007No. 1060767PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

974 So.2d 967 (2007)

Ex parte METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Charlie E. Hardy.

(In re Fred D. Gray

v.

Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Charlie E. Hardy).

1060767.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 1, 2007.

Ralph D. Gaines, Daniel S. Wolter, and Davis A. Barlow of Gaines, Wolter & Kinney, Birmingham, for petitioners.

Stanley F. Gray of Gray, Langford, Sapp, McGowan, Gray & Nathanson, Tuskegee, for respondent.

LYONS, Justice.

Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company and its agent, Charlie E. Hardy, petition this Court for a writ of mandamus…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ShowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Spradlin v. Birmingham Airport AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte Canal Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Ex Parte Breman Lake View Resort, LPSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ex Parte Cincinnati Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Frost v. DangerfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Atchison v. IPC Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Ex Parte DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Alexander v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API