Legal Opinion

Woide v. Fannie Mae

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 12, 2013No. 5D12-4276PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellants, Charles and Susannah Woide, timely appeal a non-final order denying their motion to quash service of process. They argue the summonses with which they were served were defective because neither contained the deputy clerk’s signature or the circuit court’s official seal as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(a). Appellee, Fannie Mae, properly concedes error. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.070(a); § 48.031(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011); Ball v. Jones, 65 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla.1953) (“When the Rule mandatorily requires that the summons shall be ‘issued by the Clerk’, it requires that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ball v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Schofield v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vaughn v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API