Legal Opinion

Belknap v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The April, 1968, corporate resolution of Laird, Bissel & Meeds, Inc. (LBM), on which plaintiffs’ decedent’s right to a pension is grounded, provided that “[i]n case of merger, the firm would attempt to have the pension continued, but could not, of course, guarantee that this would be the case.” As a consequence of this limitation, at the moment LBM merged with defendant, LBM’s responsibility to provide a pension could not be deemed a “debt, liability, [or] duty” that defendant agreed or was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Turner Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Am. Int'l Grp., Inc.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
  2. Hart v. Kinney Drugs, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Studio A Showroom, LLC v. YoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Wallace Industries, Inc. v. Salt City Energy VentureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. 1058 Corp. v. Enrique ErgasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API