Belknap v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The April, 1968, corporate resolution of Laird, Bissel & Meeds, Inc. (LBM), on which plaintiffs’ decedent’s right to a pension is grounded, provided that “[i]n case of merger, the firm would attempt to have the pension continued, but could not, of course, guarantee that this would be the case.” As a consequence of this limitation, at the moment LBM merged with defendant, LBM’s responsibility to provide a pension could not be deemed a “debt, liability, [or] duty” that defendant agreed or was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Turner Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carlson v. Am. Int'l Grp., Inc.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
- Hart v. Kinney Drugs, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Studio A Showroom, LLC v. YoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Wallace Industries, Inc. v. Salt City Energy VentureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- 1058 Corp. v. Enrique ErgasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.