Estate of Portuondo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 2, Jan. T., 1898, by-Maud Dugro, the stepdaughter, a legatee, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 239, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 2, Jan. T., 1898, by-Maud Dugro, the stepdaughter, a legatee, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 239, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts appear by the opinion of the lower court, by Ferguson, J., which was as follows : The testator, after some specific devises and bequests, gave all the rest, residue, and remainder of his estate to his executors in trust to invest the same, and of the net income arising therefrom pay to his wife during the full term of her natural life two thirds thereof, and the remaining third of said…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:,
The decree in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Disston's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Shannon v. EnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Reighard's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. KernSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.