Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Stein

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Larry D. Martin, J.

Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), (5) and (8).

*903Beverly Goldman was employed as an administrative assistant, from March 2001 through June 2006, by the defendant, Dr. Joseph Stein, in his medical office in Brooklyn. Among her duties were billing insurance companies and maintaining patient relations and scheduling. Ms. Goldman claims that during her employment in Dr. Stein’s office, she was “morbidly obese.” Furthermore, Ms. Goldman asserts that she became pregnant in September 2005 and gave birth to her daughter on June…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Arnav Industries, Inc. Retirement Trust v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldman v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API