Legal Opinion

Matey v. Reinman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 8, 1992No. 91-02135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant, Thomas W. Matey, appeals the summary judgment entered against him in his attempted third party action against appellee, attorney James L. Rein-man, for legal malpractice. We affirm.

In the underlying action, Vaughn J. Cannon had obtained a judgment against James H. Pruitt Real Estate, Inc., James H. Pruitt, individually, and appellant as comakers or guarantors of a promissory note. Pruitt Real Estate, Inc. paid the judgment in full and brought a cross-claim against appellant for contribution. Appellant then filed his third party complaint against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allied Productions, Inc. v. DuesterdickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  2. Leggiere v. Merrill Lynch Realty/Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rupp v. PhilpotDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Kendall v. GilmoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. THE DENTAL LAW FIRM, P.A. d/b/a SHOCHET LAW GROUP v. PAUL KINCER, SCOTT MOORE, and THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE PUBLIC ADJUSTERS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API