Legal Opinion · Dissent

Keenan v. City of Philadelphia

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 17, 1992No. 91-1306Published

1Dissent

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge,

dissenting in part,

I join in the opinion of the court as to all issues except the imposition of punitive damages. More particularly, I agree with Part IV A of the above opinion that the conduct of Grasso, Stoner, and Gallagher establishes their liability for punitive damages. I further agree that there is no basis for punitive damages against Tucker. However, I dissent because the extraordinary magnitude of the punitive damages in this ease cannot be sustained on this record which is devoid of evidence of the defendants’ financial net worth.

Although…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. FoustSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API