Legal Opinion

Bright v. Markle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

•ARPEAL from the Marion Common Fleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Indiana has the following statutory profusion:

“Whenever any county treasurer or collector for any previous year, shall have charged himself with, and accounted for, any tax that shall not have been paid to him, such tax *309shall be deemed and taken as due him personally, whether in or out of office, and may be by him collected in the same way as other taxes due and unpaid are collected.” 1 R. S., § 105, p-131.

C. L. Dunham and Gordon Tanner, for the appellant. II. ONeal, for the appellee.

Jacob Maride was treasurer of Jasper county, Indiana, and alleges that he charged himself with taxes due from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kinney v. Doe ex dem. LamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crocker v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Schaum v. ShowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API