Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Diznoff

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1986No. Civ. A. 86-194PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERALD J. WEBER, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed this action pro se. The caption of her Complaint contains the heading “Civil Rights Violation and Freedom of Information Act Violation.” 1 Presently pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, to which plaintiff has responded.

At the outset we recognize that pro se pleadings must be construed liberally. “[Cjourts must proceed painstakingly in an effort to discern the nature of plaintiff’s claim and to insure thaf his lack of familiarity with legal proceedings does not result in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dahlberg v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Henderson v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Kovacs v. GoodmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Mazur v. Pennsylvania, Department of TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Church of Scientology Int'l v. KoltsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994
  2. Rumfola v. MurovichDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API