Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Schneider National, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 21, 2003No. 02-35116PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion published at 349 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir.2003) is amended to add the following footnote at the end of the second sentence in Part III.C:
A forum non conveniens motion, as opposed to a motion to transfer based on 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), is appropriate in this case because, if the forum selection clause is enforced, Murphy will be forced to litigate against Schneider in a Wisconsin state court, rather than in a federal court. See 5A Charles Alan Wright and Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 1352 (2d ed.) (“A federal court will resort to the pre-1948 motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Richard McNatt v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Murphy v. Schneider National, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Asevedo v. NBCUniversal Media, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- AMA Multimedia LLC v. Sagan LimitedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Bindman v. MH Sub I, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Clark-Alonso v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.