Legal Opinion
Tyson v. Ozmint
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided June 22, 2007No. C.A. No. 6:06-385-PMD-WMCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon pro se Plaintiff Charles Tyson’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Tyson”) motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth herein, the court denies Plaintiffs motion.
*519 BACKGROUND
On February 10, 2006, Plaintiff filed the present action against Defendant Jon E. Oz-mint (“Defendant” or “Ozmint”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, claiming that Defendant violated and is violating his Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment by subjecting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Michael D. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Metlyn Realty Corp. v. Esmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Square Construction Company and La Fera Contracting Company v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- ANDERSON v. NOVANT HEALTHDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Al-Sabah v. AgbodjogbeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Burnett v. Aldi, Inc. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Johnson v. Bonner CountyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- McCray v. Lieber C.I.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2023