Legal Opinion

International Armament Corp. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 10, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 84-0291-APublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CACHERIS, District Judge.

This case presents the issue of whether International Armament Corporation (“Interarms”) is a “manufacturer” for purposes of the ten percent federal excise tax imposed on the sale by the “manufacturer, producer, or importer of ... [pjistols [or] *1029[revolvers” pursuant to section 4181 of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C. § 4181 (1980)). Interarms brings this tax refund action to recover $3,429.10 in excise taxes paid for the quarter ending June 30, 1980. The Government has filed a counterclaim for the unpaid balance of the assessed interest on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API