Legal Opinion
Jones v. U.S. Dep't of Justice
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 25, 2018No. Civil Action No. 13–08 (RMC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Darin Jones' pro se Motion to Reopen Based on Change in Law, or in the Alternative, Based on Oversight, which, for reasons explained below, the Court construes as a Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 60(a), or in the Alternative, Under Rule 60(b) ("Mot. for Reconsideration") [Dkt. 38]. This Court ordered the Government to respond to Mr. Jones' Motion by December 6, 2017. Apparently disinclined to do so, the Government did not file a response. Undeterred, Mr. Jones filed a Reply to Defendants Failure to Respond to Judge…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Andreski v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Gilbert v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Gu v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Low v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.