Newberry Mills, Inc. v. Dawkins
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentBussey, Justice
(dissenting) :
I most respectfully dissent as to the disposition of the first stated question in the majority opinion. The answer to this question, which this Court has not heretofore needed to expressly decide, depends upon the meaning and intent of the several sections of our Constitution dealing with ad valorem property taxes. It is elementary law that in constructon of constitutional provisions words are presumed to be used *17in their ordinary and peculiar meaning. It is further elementary that where the language of such is plain, clear and unambiguous, there is neither room nor need for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gregg Dyeing Co. v. QuerySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Duke Power Co. v. Bell, County TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Hutchins v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- National Can Corp. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.