Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 6, 1960No. 1150Published

1DissentHolden, J.

The right of appeal is a substantial right. Its foreclosure, for causes beyond the control of the party seeking appellate review, has afforded adequate justification to this Court for granting relief by way of a new trial. Nelson v. Marshall, 77 Vt. 44, 48, 58 A. 793; Reynolds v. Romano, 96 Vt. 222, 224, 118 A. 810; Walsh v. Cole, 97 Vt. 459, 460, 123 A. 850; Falzarano v. Demasso, 98 Vt. 209, 214, 126 A. 394; Hodge & Mattheis v. Vermont Stone Products Corp., 113 Vt. 491, 492, 37 A.2d 183.

In this instance the respondent’s notice of appeal, although mailed in due time, was misdirected by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MacDonald, B.N.F. v. OrtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  2. Nelson v. MarshallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  3. Reynolds v. RomanoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  5. Walsh v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API