PEOPLE v. McKINLEY
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentCavanagh, J.
This Court granted leave to appeal, in part, to address whether “Michigan’s statutory restitution scheme is unconstitutional insofar as it permits the trial court to order restitution based on *425uncharged conduct that was not submitted to a jury or proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” People v McKinley, 495 Mich 897 (2013), citing People v Gahan, 456 Mich 264; 571 NW2d 503 (1997). As our grant order illustrates, questions regarding the constitutionality of Michigan’s restitution scheme have arisen since the Legislature’s enactment of MCL 780.766(2) and after Gahan was decided. The majority,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Ford Motor Company v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Nation v. W D E Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Pulver v. Dundee Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.