State v. Surles
Supreme Court of North Carolina
INDICTMENT for disposing of mortgaged property, tried before StarluoTc, J., and a jury, at Spring Term, 1895, of Harnett Superior Court. The defendant was convicted and appealed. The facts sufficiently appear in tbe opinion of Associate Justice MontgoMery.
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY. J.:
The defendant was indicted in Har-nett county, under section 1089 of The Oode, for disposing of mortgaged property ; and at August Term, 1893, of the Superior court of Harnett, the case was removed to the county of Johnston for trial. When the case was called the defendant moved to quash, upon the following grounds: (1) That the counts in the bill of indictment were repugnant ; (2) that the description of the land in the mortgage and bill was insufficient: (3) that the transcript of the order of removal was insufficient. Upon the motion being denied by the court, the defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. . ParishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Goodman v. . SappSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- State v. . WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- State v. . CredleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Woodlief v. . Harris and ParhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harris v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- State v. . TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Brown v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- In re SteeleDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.